Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Translate this header
VRT Noticeboard
Welcome to the VRT noticeboard

This page is where users can communicate with Commons Volunteers Response Team members, or VRT agents with one another. You can request permissions verification here, or anything else that needs an agent's assistance. This page is multilingual — when discussing tickets in languages other than English, please make a note of this and consider asking your question in the same language.

Please read the Frequently Asked Questions before posting your question here.

The current backlog of the (English) permissions-commons queue is: 5 days (graph)  update

Start a new discussion

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021

VRT Noticeboard
Main VRT-related pages
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)

Shortcuts: Commons:VRT/N • Commons:VRTN

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 30 days.

Godehard Lietzow[edit]

Hi, There are several issues about these artworks:

In addition, for all 4 images, it is said that the author is "Karl Horst Hartmann". Who did send the permission? Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: The first two files are the same. Ticket is writen in German. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 08:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Permission in ticket:2008012910009395 is valid for File:Godehard_Lietzow.jpg and File:Die_gestrandete_Kueste.jpg. Above images are not included in the ticket. Ping to @Kumagorocom: , the uploader of these images (not active here since 2008, but perhaps they can take action). Ellywa (talk) 10:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Watercolor paintings by Godehard Lietzow. Yann (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 11:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One-month delay[edit]

Hi guys. It says above that a backlog is around 5 days. Is it for getting a response here or for a ticket review? I'm asking because my uploads have not been reviewed after a month. In the last couple of days I asked copyrights holders to forward me the e-mails with OTRS permissions they sent you and I have recieved them, so it is not the case of the authors forgetting do send you a proper message or something. I'm talking about 22 pictures from 11th October (starting with File:Lendak men's shirt.jpg) and then another four from 14th October (starting with File:Mala Frankova costumes - FS Frankovcan.jpg). All of them are already marked as deletion candidates with a proper licencing missing for more than 15 days, even though I still haven't been formally notified. OTRS mails were sent in English as the copyrights owners are Slovaks and this language is not supported as I belive. Aʀvєδuι + 19:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ticket:2021101210012754, hi @Arvedui89: , please ask them to reply to the VRT agent's mail. –Yahya (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yahya, from back in October or a new one? I assume they haven't seen anything from you, as they have not mentioned it to me last time we spoke. Aʀvєδuι + 10:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Arvedui89 The mail was recieved on 10/12/2021 and the agent also replied that day. Yahya (talk) 11:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yahya: , I'll get in touch with them ASAP. I just wanted to mention that the second batch of files (four I mentioned above) were a subject of a copyrights by another entity (folk group represented by its director) and that OTRS mail was sent 18th October. These files are still marked as heading to deletion. Is there any chance for me to take part in it? It took me a few weeks to get their approval (both Mr Vavák – 22 pictures – and mr Lach – four pictures) and I'm affraid it will all collapse because of the bureaucracy, specifically concluded in a foreign language. Aʀvєδuι + 19:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Arvedui89: For the second batch (ticket:2021101810001988), FS Frankovčan was asked to resend the permission from an official e-mail account of their organization. But we didn't receive any reply yet. If the images are deleted, they will still be restored after receiving proper permission.Yahya (talk) 20:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yahya – I’m not sure they (Folklorná skupina Frankovčan), folk group from a village of 186 inhabitants, do have an official e-mail account. For sure they do not have an official website, just a Facebook page where I contacted them [1]. by the way their Facebook url ends with jan.lach.984. I'll get in touch with him as well. Aʀvєδuι + 21:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC) [EDIT] (@Yahya: ) I believe Mr Vaváak have sent a reply (your mail went stright to the spam folder), while Mr Lach assured me that they do not have a separate e-mail adress. What do we do now? Aʀvєδuι + 12:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Krd: –Yahya (talk) 14:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly is the question? --Krd 09:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yahya and Krd: Ok, to sum things up: first part of my application is resolved, as tickets were finally given to 22 Miroslav Vavák’s pictures. However there are still four photos (1, 2, 3, 4) I uploaded on the 14th October and a permission was sent on the 18th October. Copyright holder here is a small folk group Frankovčan on which behalf permission was granted by its principal/director Ján Lach. He was subsequently asked to send it from Frankovčan’s e-mail account which they do not have. They do not have a website either, what does not stop them from existing. Question is: Is posessing a separate e-mail adress necessary to effectively give permission for using pictures under certain licence? If not, what should I as an uploader, or the copyright owner, do to mark files as properly licenced rather than them being nominated for deletion for the second month running? If it will help, I have saved our whole e-mail conversation, however it was conducted in Slovak. Aʀvєδuι + 07:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is not required to have any special e-mail address, but any kind of other feedback from the copyright holder is required explaining the situation, because otherwise the ticket cannot be processed further. Please ask the just to respond with anything reasonable. --Krd 17:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: I'm on my way. However in the future pinging me would help saving time. Just saying. Aʀvєδuι + 07:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Individual pings are no possible with the current workload. Feel free to encourage the permission sender to keep you in CC. --Krd 11:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd - We're back in contact already. Sadly Gmail seems to mark Wikimedia adresses as spam once again. Aʀvєδuι + 23:41, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pintér Réka[edit]

Could you please check the permission for File:Hétfájdalmú Szent Szűz-kápolna (Kálvária). Fotó- Glasz Fotó.jpg. There are other uploads by this user with the same EXIF data. I would not request another permission if the ticket says that Pintér Réka=Glasz Fotó. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Permission is writen in -hu. --Ganímedes (talk) 10:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Regasterios: ping for one of the active agents understanding Hungarian. Ellywa (talk) 11:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pintér Réka is not equal to Glasz fotó. PR has sent their permission in PDF. See the ticket at the file. --Regasterios (talk) 08:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Status[edit]

What's https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D8%B1%D8%B3%D9%85%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A8%D9%86_%D8%BA%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%85.jpg status ? permission granted or no ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorrectionKSA (talk • contribs) 09:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @CorrectionKSA: . What ticket number it is? --Ganímedes (talk) 10:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ticket#2021112010005174 CorrectionKSA (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CorrectionKSA Vrt agent asked some additional questions about this file but customer fails to provide those information. —MdsShakil (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I provide every information about this file, and answered all questions about it. the other one (Ticket#2021112010005101) is what vrt agent stopped discussing with me. CorrectionKSA (talk) 11:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@CorrectionKSA Please contact this file creator/copyright holder and ask him to send a mail with permission at VRT —MdsShakil (talk) 14:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did, said that he send an email giving me all rights to use it on Ticket#2021112110003352 CorrectionKSA (talk) 18:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is not a valid permission. The copyright holder should email us directly. We don't accept forwarded permissions. Please ask the copyright holder to email us directly. --Ganímedes (talk) 20:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
he is the copyright holder, he said he told u guys that i have permission on..Ticket#2021112110003352 CorrectionKSA (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He is not the copyright holder. The copyright holder is the photographer, not the subject. And permission is to anyone, not just for you. There the problem. --Ganímedes (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help to verify image file: G8Db3.jpeg permission[edit]

Till now still have no VRTS members to verify this image file: G8Db3.jpeg

url: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:G8Db3.jpeg

Anyone who holds VRTS account,could you please help to verify this permission,Thank you!

I've sent in an email about this file,but the file page have a notice said :”The email is in a queue awaiting processing. For an update on the issue, please contact someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT agent, this file will be deleted.”

Some things: a) The ticket it's from today (21:56 22/11 at South America right now). It could take some time to answer. b) The agent has made a question but it's still unanswered. c) Yet, the source point to a different photo, so is not possible to verify the license. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please tell me that the source of this image File:謝大俠.jpg url : File:謝大俠.jpg - Wikimedia Commons have no listed source ,it's just wrote Own work. Why doesn't he encounter the warning of being deleted? Did you engrave me deliberately? Is there a dark operation behind Wikimedia Commons ? Many pictures are no sources, and there is no warning of deletion. Can you tell me why? 212.129.81.236 05:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you mean (and the extra drama it's pointless): you've sent permission for this file: [2], naming this web as source: [3]. It's pretty much obvious these are *not* the same files, even when could be shoot the same day, right? --Ganímedes (talk) 10:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is a same file,this picture is one of the file’s picture ,was included inside the Album, The source and usage rights are very clear .The proof and evidence submitted are sufficient,not pointless. 212.129.85.190 13:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously not, if one looks at from and the other is looking to the side. Link the exact URL of the source of the file uploaded to commons. --Ganímedes (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ganímedes: https://www.instagram.com/p/CVdlctKjpnj/?utm_medium=copy_link is an album; the subject photo is picture 3 of 9 in that album; click the little right arrow near the right border twice. I also added to Ticket:2021112210007071.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:BANDERA CARDIEL (1) (1).svg[edit]

The customer has uploaded this file: File:BANDERA CARDIEL (1) (1).svg. However I only can see a white space. Can someone please check what is going on? Ticket:2021090110004812. Thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be one of the usual issues with the thumbnail generator. If you click into the white space you will get the original SVG image of a flag. De728631 (talk) 13:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Ganímedes (talk) 23:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings uploaded by User:René Cheng[edit]

Each of these has "This painting is copyright protected by law." Are there permissions for these? Thanks, Krok6kola (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no permission found in the permissions queue on VRT. BTW, the Glowing Marilyn appears a derivative work of this. Ellywa (talk) 01:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. So I should nominate them for deletion? Krok6kola (talk) 01:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They claim to be the artist, and absent any trace of the paintings on an external website, there is no need for COM:VRT. If we get a VRT permission, it will be completely useless, as it will just be an email from an unverifiable address claiming to be the author, which is no more convincing than a Commons account; I cannot find any publicly available email address for this artist online. So we can just COM:AGF that the uploader is who they claim to be. However, if the paintings are COM:DW of other images, then that is a valid cause for concern. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fully agree. Ellywa (talk) 07:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's a description, but no image, of Joy at https://www.danielebasso.it/eventi/2018/02_Meneghetti/pdf/DidascalieOpere.pdf Vexations (talk) 12:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance requested: Ticket #2021112410004444[edit]

Hi VRT, I submitted ticket:2021112410004444 on 24 November and received a response later the same day from Jarosław Tuszyński indicating that my authority to allow the release was not sufficiently verifiable. I therefore submitted two further emails that same day (one from a public email address of my organisation and one a forwarded email from the COO of my organisation regarding my authority). I haven't heard back since then, so I would appreciate if an agent could check if that correspondence came through, and let me know if it is sufficient or if you need more. Many thanks. - Htonl (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears this was misunderstood by the ticket owner. Ticket is now reopened. --Krd 15:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. - Htonl (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. It has been 10 days now since the ticket was re-opened and I haven't received any response. Please can I request someone take another look at this ticket? Thanks - Htonl (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Htonl
Yes check.svg Resolved
—MdsShakil (talk) 05:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! - Htonl (talk) 06:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Htonl (talk) 06:14, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to obtain permission for works that are too time-consuming for holder to upload[edit]

I'm looking to ask the Washington Legislative Information Center for permission for a few thousand photos housed in PDFs here as well 15 (only necessary since 1989) from each of [4] and [5]. How do I go about doing this, as it would be a potentially major waste of time to upload all of them before securing permission, and the burden is clearly on me to upload them, making the standard permission process requiring Commons URLs unfeasible. I've considered similar projects before, and certainly will consider others in the future, so it would be great to learn about how I could go about this. A somewhat similar case can be found here: Template:Iowa General Assembly official portrait permission. Star Garnet (talk) 19:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just go to COM:RELGEN and fill out the form yourself, providing dummy information if required. You'll get a text output in the end, which you can then modify as appropriate to make it refer to all images or a specific class of images available on a certain website. Send that text to the Washington Legislative Information Center and tell them that if they agree to the terms, they should sign and date it (either electronically or as a scanned document) and send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Note: Do not ask them to send the completed form to you and then forward it to VRT; they should send it directly. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undelet of file File:LenkaHelenaKoenigsmark.jpg[edit]

Hello,

it was recommended to us in "Commons:Undeletion requests" to contact you in here in case of undelete the photo file LenkaHelenaKoenigsmark.jpg, because it seems we are somehow get stucked. Probably because the volunteer of our case unfortunatelly died recently, as was told to us in the forum.

This case is since June 20. We added the photo before, but it was deleted because of insufficient rights. At first, we only had confirmation from the magazine's editors. Which was not enought. So as was recommened to us we added the rights sent directly by the photographer. And nothing happened. So we were recommended to sent it to another email, which was done and the photographer received confirmation that it is OK. But the photo is still not available. Again, we consulted in the undelete forum and we were advised to contact you here because it looks like we got stuck somewhere in the interspace because our agent died in the meantime. Could you please check it and udelete the photo? Or should we uploaded again?

Ticket number should be: 2021081910005781

Thank you very much for your time.

--Lenka Koe (talk) 13:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lenka Koe: The correct filename is File:Lenka Helena Koenigsmark.jpg (with spaces). I have undeleted the file for now and will add a note to Ticket:2021081910005781. This might lead to the correspondence being finalized. If not succesfull, the image will be deleted again in some weeks. Ellywa (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 11:44, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ticket:2016052510034637[edit]

An undeletion request has been filed for File:"True Prosperity".jpg where the permission was sent but apparently the ticket has not yet been processed or feedback is still needed. Can you please check the state of this ticket? De728631 (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@De728631: Sorry, some backend processing was not completed, please undelete for further processing, mark as {{subst:OR|2016052510034637}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Thank you for looking this up. I undeleted the file, so please proceed. De728631 (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@De728631: ✓ Done, please enable the MarkAdmins gadget so that you may more easily process requests from my fellow VRT Agents who do not identify themselves on COM:UDR. You are also welcome to join us.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again. This gadget is really useful, too. De728631 (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@De728631: You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gossy Ukanwoke.jpg[edit]

Please validate OTRS permissions for this file. Please ping me in your reply. Timtrent (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: The text of the license release is valid. There is no hard evidence that the sender is the creator, but given that no copies of this image exist at this high resolution online, COM:AGF should be OK here. (I personally would have probed deeper given the existence of earlier low-resolution copies online, but it definitely falls within agent discretion and I don't see a compelling case to reopen an accepted ticket.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts Thank you. It is used at present in a rejected draft on en WP. The draft has been rejected by @Celestina007 whose antennae are usually accurate for likely UPE from Nigeria. WIth a valid text of the licence release this one is more subtle than many, assuming it to be UPE. I am not asking for the ticket to be reopened. Timtrent (talk) 17:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/Noticeboard&oldid=614377270"